Chasing liberty essays

Chasing liberty essays In the movie called Chasing Liberty, a typical teenage movie with romance, love and comedy give us a great example of what a romantic comedy truly is. As a romantic comedy, it is usually a story about two people who have strong feelings for one another, but however they cannot. In Chasing Liberty, it is a story about Anna Foster, the daughters president and Ben Calder, a secret agent. Inevitably, Anna finds a way to live like a normal teenager by ditching the agents who consistently track every move she makes. In a wild escape one night in the town of Prague, she meets a mysterious man whom she knows as Ben. As she takes on her European adventure, she falls in love with Ben, not realizing that Ben is also an agent watching out for her. This prevents him from telling the truth in his requited love for Anna because of the fact that if Anna discovered his identity, it will affect what he does. Because Ben has a sense of dignity and pride in what he does, he knows he must act professionally and not destroy his cover. Nevertheless, Ben finds himself under the influence of power over which he has no control over and suffers in his wil l to keep his love for Anna. The hindering and helping characters in this movie are both Annas parents. As Anna goes on her crazy adventure, her parents realize that they do not want Ben to be the one watching her any further. Back at home, Anna mends her broken heart as she felt deceived by Ben in telling her who he was, until the end of both their journey. She tries to find a way to forget about Ben and after a long period of time away at college, her dad, the president tells Ben that he is no longer an agent, but has been doing something he really loves. This ultimately gives hints to Anna, who has matured and taken the mind and body of an adult, that she is able to see Ben. In the end, they are inseparable as if they met for the first time. ...

The Internet, Past, Present, and Future

The Internet, Past, Present, and Future Some thirty years ago, the RAND Corporation, America's foremost Cold War think-tank, faced a strange strategic problem. How could the U.S. authorities successfully communicate after a nuclear war?Post-nuclear America would need a command-and-control network, linked from city to city, state to state, base to base. However, no matter how thoroughly that network was armored or protected, its switches and wiring would always be vulnerable to the impact of atomic bombs. A nuclear attack would destroy any conceivable network.How would the network itself be commanded and controlled? Any central authority, any network central citadel,would be an obvious and immediate target for an enemy missile. The center of the network would be the very first place to be destroyed. RAND mulled over this grim puzzle in deep military secrecy, and arrived at a daring solution. The RAND proposal was made public in 1964. In the first place, the network would 'have no central authority.'English: ARPANET logical map circa 1977Furthermore,it would be 'designed from the beginning to operate while in tatters.'The principles were simple. The network itself would be assumed to be unreliable at all times. It would be designed from the beginning to transcend its own unreliability. All the nodes in the network would be equal in status to all other nodes, each node with its own authority to originate, pass, and receive messages. The messages themselves would be divided into packets, each packet separately addressed. Each packet would begin at some specified source node, and end at some other specified destination node. Each packet would wind its way through the network on an individualbasis.The particular route that the packet took would be unimportant; only final results would count. Basically, the packet would be passed from node to node to node, more or less in the direction of...

Britta Riede Harrison Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Britta Riede Harrison - Essay Example These social techniques include driving, analytical, amiable and expressive. The four social styles the leader should know fall into three dimensions; responsiveness, versatility, assertiveness. Assertiveness is gauged from one’s tendencies to tell or ask in interacting with others. The â€Å"ask† tendency is more reserved whereas the â€Å"tell† tendency is more outgoing. Responsiveness is a perception of one by others as to whether he displays control in situations or shows his feelings and emotions. In this dimension, one can be more emoting or more controlling. Responsiveness can be expressed verbally based on the tone, subjects being discussed and the descriptions given, and non-verbally based on gestures, body postures and facial expressions. When fitted into these three dimensions, definite traits manifest in the 4 social forms. Knowing these traits is crucial for anyone in a leadership position. For instance, as he can understand himself and his subordinates better and possibly predict their reactions when faced with different situations. He is also able to assess his own character intelligently and make necessary adjustments. Analytical style is characterised by seriousness, exaction, indecision and manifestation of logic. Driving style is characterised by one being independent, formal, practical and dominating. Amiable style is characterised by dependability; supportive, pliable and openness and expressive style is characterised by animation, impulsive, being forceful and opinionated. Identifying ones social style is very critical in dealing with tension as a leader. You get to know how others perceive you, how to go about tension and other’s back-up styles and to talk about other’s tension but not one’s own in conversations. It is true that some tension is needed for optimum productivity, but too much tension lowers productivity and so does too little tension. Relationships go down in the